|
The question is more complex. The problem is that the movement of the planets has nothing to do with light or the speed of light. As such the concept of the visible universe is not important for their behaviour.
In the case of Newton Mechanics the force of gravity and the speed of gravity are important. The speed of gravity is the reason that the movement of two objects does not point to their present position but towards a position in the past.
|
In the case of General Relativity the concept curvature of spacetime is introduced. Both concepts are mathematical concepts and as far as I understand can not be observed.
Newton's mechanics also uses the concept and gravitational fields and specific in case of a binary system these fields propagate, from the center of gravity of both objects, away from the outside of both planets. Inside both planets the force of gravity acts almost instantaneous towards each other. That means Newton mechanics does not use the concept of curvature of space.
It is important that any theory depents in principle on observations in the past and observations in the future. The use of any theory or law is that the observations performed in the past should be used to predict the observations in the future. The theory or law that makes the most accurate predictions is the best.
In the case of Newton mechanics the only observations are the positions of the each object involved as a function of a sequence of time steps, partly in the past and partly in the future. Using Newton mechanics first the masses of the objects are calculated.
Newton mechanics also calculates velocities and accelerations but these parameters are not 'physical important'.
In the case of General Relavity more or less the same strategy should be followed. That means if the objects have a mass than first the masses should be calcualted using GR. My understanding is that concepts like spacetime and curvature are not important. What is important are the predicted positions in the future using GR.
Back to my home page Index